Blog 10: EQ

1. Review this. Confirm by stating "I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ."

• I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

2. Review the following EQs and: tell us if each meets the rule of three, tell why they do or don't.

• The first three questions meet the first rule. The first and third question are the one that people can really take a stance. All the questions have good formatting in my opinion,
• The first question is understandable and can have a variation of answers.
• The second question is too straight forward and probably only has one answer
• The third question is very good and leads to multiple answers.
• The fourth question has the same problem as the second one; there is only answer to the question.

3. Based on your review of the rule of 3 and your experience with assessing four EQs, please write another draft EQ for your senior project.

• My original EQ "What is the best way to satisfy a patient as a Physical Therapist?" follows the three rules and I feel that this EQ is just fine as is.

Lesson 1 Reflection

1. What are you most proud of in your Lesson 1 Presentation and why?

• When I was talking about pediatric therapy, I was talking the differences of treating an adult and a child. I explained how adults come in with a problem with their body and I acted how they would do it. They would come in and say, "Ahh, mah leg." or "Ahh, mah back." It was pretty funny.

2. a. What assessment would you give yourself on your Lesson 1 Presentation (self-assessment)?

• AP

    b. Explain why you deserve that grade using evidence from the Lesson 1 component contract.

• I forgot to do my hook activity and conclusion.

3. What worked for you in your Lesson 1?

• I had a lot of stuff to say that came from studies and articles that I read.

4. If you had a time machine, what would you have done differently to improve your Lesson 1?

• I would do my hook activity and conclusion cause I forgot to do them.